I just watched part of a Senate hearing concerning the newly proposed missile defense plan and let me tell you, the last time I was this upset is when I listened to the State of the Union. Our Secretary of Defense just spouted the most circumloquential bunk in order to answer the honest question, "What is the justification for implementing the project without fully testing it?"
And to top that off, the man running the hearing has more information on the subject than the four star general who is not only a proponent of the whole project but also is working with the Secretary on the proposal. Does that seem a slightly wrong to anyone else? Am I alone on this?